Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Jane Doe #4 v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc., et al
as 20-90007
Respondent:
MICROTEL INN & SUITES FRANCHISING, INC., WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS INC and CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Petitioner:
JANE DOE #4
Dunn v. Poe et al
as 7:2019cv01571
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #4 and Megan Dunn
Defendant:
Deborah Johnson, Gilbert Jean, JC Poe, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jane Doe 4 v. Red Roof Inns, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03845
Defendant:
Choice Hotels International, Inc., John Does 1-10, Red Roof Inns, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 4
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1589
Gregory v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv00381
Defendant:
John Doe 6, M. Chaney, John/Jane Does 10, 11 and others
Plaintiff:
Larry F. Gregory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miracles House Inc. et al v. Secretary, Agency for Healthcare Administration et al
as 1:2017cv23582
Plaintiff:
Miracles House Inc. , Jane Doe 1 , Jane Doe 2 and others
Defendant:
Secretary, Agency for Healthcare Administration and Director of Agency for Persons with Disabilities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Lockett et al
as 5:2017cv00324
Plaintiff:
Gordon C. Reid
Defendant:
FNU Lockett, FNU Taylor, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miracles House Inc. et al v. Senior, et al
as 1:2017cv20550
Plaintiff:
Miracles House Inc. , Jane Doe #1 , Jane Doe #2 and others
Defendant:
Junior M. Senior and Barbara Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-16167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
