Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Collins v. Colvin
as 4:2015cv00272
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Collins
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Collins v. Slack et al
as 3:2011cv00909
Plaintiff:
William R. Collins
Defendant:
Paul E. Slack , Aquilex Hydrochem, Inc and Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collins et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02983
Plaintiff:
Michelle R Collins , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corp, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Key v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2010cv00943
Plaintiff:
Willie D. Key
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Timothy R. Collins and Marilyn S. Kavanaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cooks v. Nelson et al
as 3:2009cv00484
Plaintiff:
Windsor E. Cooks
Defendant:
Arvid S. Nelson, James W. Pimentel, Daniel E. Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughley v. Collins (INMATE3)
as 3:2008cv00116
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Defendant:
W. R. Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dewhart v. City of Montgomery et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2008cv00111
Plaintiff:
Willie Davis Dewhart
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and W. R. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughley v. City of Montgomery et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and Willie R. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. City of Montgomery et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00108
Plaintiff:
Keith Tolbert
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and Willie R. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughley v. Collins (INMATE3)
as 3:2008cv00102
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Defendant:
Willie R. Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
