Cases 21 - 30 of 38
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv24294
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON S BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. Adkinson et al
as 8:2019cv03166
Defendant:
Ms. S Baker, Ms. Adkinson, Mr. D Colon and others
Plaintiff:
Romulus Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
as 2:2019cv00877
Plaintiff:
Holly S. Baker
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC and The Bank of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARDS v. JONES ET AL
as 4:2018cv00555
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS TARON EDWARDS
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES, R ROSSELL, CENTURION HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. The Next Level Training Center, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv00941
Plaintiff:
Dustin S. Baker
Defendant:
The Next Level Training Center, Inc. and Eric Statman
Mediator:
Mark A. Hanley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Baker v. Jones et al
as 8:2014cv01258
Plaintiff:
Gary S. Baker
Defendant:
M. Jones and D. Moyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julius Baker v. John Wheeler
as 12-16556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIUS S BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN L. WHEELER, C.H.I.P. Home Coordinator of Bacon County Board of Commissioners
Julius Baker v. William Deveaux, et al
as 12-13408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIUS S BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM P. DEVEAUX, 6th Episcopal District, Georgia, in his individual and official capacities and FRANK C. CUMMINGS, 6th Episcopal District, Georgia, in his individual and official capacities
Baker v. Boatright et al
as 5:2012cv00041
Plaintiff:
Julius S. Baker, Sr.
Defendant:
Mike Boatright and Julie Lord
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker v. Deveaux et al
as 5:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
Julius S. Baker, Sr.
Defendant:
William P. Deveaux and Frank C. Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
