Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 52
The State of Alabama et al v. United States Department of Commerce et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00211
Defendant: United States Department of Commerce, Ron Jarmin, United States Bureau of the Census and others
Plaintiff: William Green, Robert Aderholt, The State of Alabama and others
Amicus Curiae: Aleksandra Slavkovic, State of Utah, Aaron Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Invictus v. South Carolina et al
as 5:2021cv00109
Defendant: York County Solicitor's Office, South Carolina, Solicitor Kevin Brackett and others
Plaintiff: Augustus Invictus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Bennett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00309
Defendant: Clerk Patricia S. Connor, Ms. Christa T. Bell, David Hamilton and others
Plaintiff: Charles Randall Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
People First of Alabama, et al v. Secretary of State, et al
as 20-13695
Plaintiff / Appellant: BLACK VOTERS MATTER CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE, GREATER BIRMINGHAM MINISTRIES, HOWARD PORTER, JR. and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
Defendant / Appellant: DON DAVIS, SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF TEXAS and others
The New Georgia Project, et al v. Brad Raffensperger, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-13360
Defendant / Appellant: AHN LE, in their official capacities as Members of the Georgia State Election Board, DAVID J. WORLEY, BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, in his official capacity as the Georgia Secretary of State and the Chair of the Georgia State Election Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: BEVERLY PYNE, CANDACE WOODALL, REAGAN JENNINGS and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Kelvin Jones, et al v. Governor of Florida, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-12003
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE, STATE OF NEBRASKA, THE STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Defendant / Appellant: GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA SECRETARY OF STATE
Plaintiff / Appellee: LUIS A MENDEZ, CURTIS BRYANT, LEE HOFFMAN and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF ALABAMA
Yashica Robinson, et al v. Attorney General, State of Ala, et al
as 20-11401
Defendant / Appellant: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and SCOTT HARRIS
Plaintiff / Appellee: YASHICA ROBINSON, ALABAMA WOMEN'S CENTER, WEST ALABAMA WOMEN'S CENTER and others
Not Classified By Court: AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, SERVICE, SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF VERMONT, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Clervrain v. Way, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00540
Defendant: United States District Court for the District of California, United States Department Office of the Labor, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff: Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelvin Jones, et al v. Governor of Florida, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-14551
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE and ARTHUR CARL HASPEL
Defendant / Appellant: GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA SECRETARY OF STATE
Plaintiff / Appellee: CURTIS BRYANT, KELVIN LEON JONES, DIANE SHERRILL and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
United States of America et al v. Mims Management Group, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00318
Defendant: Northeast Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Institutional Pharmacy Solutions, LLC, Mims Management Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff: State of Alabama, United States of America, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?