Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Watson v. Broward County Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2019cv61639
Defendant:
Sandi Digiamo, George Anthony, William Steers and others
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv00248
Plaintiff:
Lisa R Lee
Defendant:
United States of America
Respondent:
Warden Patricia Bradley and US Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lenz v. Baker County Detention Center et al
as 3:2018cv01074
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ellis Moses Lenz
Defendant:
US Federal Justice Dept., US Marshall Service, Baker County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitchurch v. Elarbee Thompson Wilson & Sapp, LLP et al
as 1:2017cv05205
Plaintiff:
Julie P. Whitchurch
Defendant:
Elarbee Thompson Wilson & Sapp, LLP, Read Gignilliant, Douglas Duerr and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Cohens v. US Marshal Services Atlanta et al
as 1:2017cv04821
Plaintiff:
James Cohens
Defendant:
US Marshal Services Atlanta, John Does and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 1:2017cv01926
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes, US Marshals Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COBBLE v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017mc00018
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant:
JEFF B SESSIONS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGIA REGIONAL MENTAL HOSPITALS COLUMBUS and others
Banks v. Sessions et al
as 1:2017cv01771
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Jeff Sessions, J.C. Holland, Mark R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ison v. Chief US Marshal et al
as 1:2016cv01433
Petitioner:
Paul Ison
Respondent:
Chief US Marshal, Warden and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dowdy v. Couch et al
as 2:2016cv00078
Plaintiff:
James Lee Dowdy
Defendant:
Gerald Couch, Marcus Neville, B. Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
