Cases 31 - 40 of 5,306
Thomas et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01993
Plaintiff:
Walter Thomas and Desmond Bailey
Defendant:
Victor Hill and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Thomas McClary, et al
as 24-11397
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS MCCLARY and FIFTH AVENUE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, ORLANDO DIVISION, COMMODORES ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, DAVID FISH and others
Crawford v. Ladnier et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Martin Crawford
Defendant:
Darrell Ladnier, Shelton Hamilton, Walter Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Spangler v. Echevarria et al
as 1:2024cv01899
Plaintiff:
Walter Spangler
Defendant:
Victor Perez Echevarria, Santiago Brothers, Inc. and Progressive Express Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cullars v. Murchison et al
as 1:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Albert Cullars
Defendant:
Walter Murchison and Oakley Granite Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hammer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00461
Defendant:
3M Company, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Hammer, James Barnes, J Kim Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Benjamin Watson, Jr., et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 24-11310
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN WATSON, JR., SHEILA WILEMON WATSON, SHANE WALTERS and others
Defendant:
KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA
Bridges v. Ward et al
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Bridges
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Warden Walter Berry, Eric Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
