Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Bales v. First Service Residential, Inc.
as 6:2018cv01525
Plaintiff:
Dean Bales
Defendant:
First Service Residential, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bales v. Citibank, N.A.
as 8:2017cv02795
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bales
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
National Interstate Insurance Company v. Bales & Langley Towing & Recovery, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00049
Plaintiff:
National Interstate Insurance Company
Defendant:
Bales & Langley Towing & Recovery, Inc., Bales & Langley Body & Paint Shop, Inc. and Dale Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bales v. Regions Bank
as 8:2016cv03506
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bales
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Gavin v. West Plam Beach Police Department et al
as 9:2016cv81837
Plaintiff:
Authneil Gavin
Defendant:
West Plam Beach Police Department, Douglas Scott Bales, Gregory Rideau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caliber Home Loans, Inc. v. Bales et al
as 3:2016cv01167
Plaintiff:
Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
Defendant:
Brady Bales, Ariel Acosta and CMG Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Bales v. Corizon Medical Services Inc. et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00714
Plaintiff:
David H. Bales
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services Inc., Jean Darbouze, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bales v. Woodall & Broome, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00444
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bales
Defendant:
Woodall & Broome, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
HULEY v. MASSEE et al
as 5:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
TRAVISE HULEY
Defendant:
BILL MASSEE, PAUL STEPHEN BUCZYNSKY and BALE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Malta et al
as 9:2015cv80939
Plaintiff:
Marquis R. Jones
Defendant:
Christian Malta, Sidney L Fitz-Coy, Douglas Scott Bales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
