Cases 31 - 40 of 2,208
Mantooth v. Dynamic Directional Boring, LLC
as 3:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Corey Ray Mantooth
Defendant:
Dynamic Directional Boring, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
MOORE v. FINKE et al
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
LARRANCE DURELLE MOORE
Defendant:
OKALOOSA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, OKALOOSA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, DAVID RICHARD FINKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Adams v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Corey Adams
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange County)
as 6:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Corey A. Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kanthal Corporation v. Custom Wire Products, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Kanthal Corporation
Defendant:
Custom Wire Products, LLC and Corey Latham
Jackson v. Gordy
as 7:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Corey Khalil Jackson
Defendant:
Warden Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOUAD v. WILLIAMS et al
as 4:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
OMAR MOHSEN IBRAHIM FOUAD
Defendant:
Deputy NASHAN WILLIAMS, Deputy VINCENT CORNELIUS, Deputy COREY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FOUAD v. WILLIAMS et al
as 0:2024cv60247
Plaintiff:
OMAR MOHSEN IBRAHIM FOUAD
Defendant:
NASHAN WILLIAMS, VINCENT CORNELIUS, COREY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
