Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Welch
as 1:2011cv03212
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Renee D. T. Welch
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv61997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Administration Security et al
as 2:2011cv14042
Plaintiff:
Freddie Lamot Sanders
Defendant:
Administration Security, Steven Varhol and D T Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanderson v. Alabama State Bar Disciplinary Commission et al
as 2:2010cv00878
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Sanderson
Defendant:
Alabama State Bar Disciplinary Commission, Montgomery County Jail, Robert E. Luske, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Turner et al
as 3:2010cv00677
Plaintiff:
James Grant
Defendant:
David Turner, L.A.M.R. Express, Inc., L.A.M.R. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Couch v. Marshall et al
as 2:2010cv00661
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Monique Couch
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall and Dante' Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D.T. v. Sheriff's Dept. of Baldwin County et al
as 1:2010cv00348
Plaintiff:
D. T.
Defendant:
Sheriff's Dept. of Baldwin County , Huey Mack and Wal-Mart Supercenter of Bay Minette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeney v. Marshall et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00373
Plaintiff:
Richard Barker Freeney
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall, C.O. Lyold, C.O. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carthen v. Marshall et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00334
Plaintiff:
Tremane D. Carthen
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall, Montgomery County Detention Facility, Dr. Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
