Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Andrew Bennett, et al v. Jefferson County, Alabama
as 19-13577
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLYN R. CULPEPPER, SHARON OWENS, SHARON RICE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA
David PoseyIn re: David Posey
as 19-12156
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID RUSSELL POSEY
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
David Posey v. Scott Middlebrooks, et al
as 18-12452
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID RUSSELL POSEY
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT A. MIDDLEBROOKS, Warden and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Burroughs et al v. Brown et al
as 3:2018cv00480
Plaintiff:
Wendy Marion Burroughs and David Russell Burroughs
Defendant:
Montrez Perez Brown and Cooley Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gines v. Loar et al
as 2:2018cv14139
Defendant:
Deryl Loar , David Russell and Indian River County Sheriff Department
Plaintiff:
Brian Gines, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Russell v. Starr Indemnity and Liability Insurance Company
as 4:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
Rodney David Russell
Defendant:
Starr Indemnity and Liability Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brannan et al v. Equifax, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03708
Plaintiff:
Emily Smith Brannan and David Russell Arwood
Defendant:
Equifax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FITZGERALD v. GRACEVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 5:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
MARK WALLACE FITZGERALD
Defendant:
GRACEVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, SEAN GILLIS, DAVID RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Fitzgerald v. Sean Gillis, et al
as 15-14677
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK WALLACE FITZGERALD
Defendant - Appellee:
SEAN GILLIS, Assistant Warden, DAVID RUSSELL, Lt Correctional Officer, GRINDER, Sgt. Correctional Officer and others
POSEY v. MIDDLEBROOKS
as 3:2015cv00452
Petitioner:
DAVID RUSSELL POSEY
Respondent:
SCOTT MIDDLEBROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
