Cases 31 - 40 of 310
McGraw et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv13337
Plaintiff:
Brandon K McGraw and Gale McGraw
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc., Sanofi S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez Cruz v. Fleegle
as 1:2023cv20424
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Cruz
Defendant:
Gale Fleegle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peden et al v. Gwathney et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Terry Henderson Peden and The Law Group of THP, PLLC.
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Davidson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Darrell Leon Davidson, David Michael Martin, Larry James Martin and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
BUETTNER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25016
Plaintiff:
IAN GALE BUETTNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GALES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24221
Plaintiff:
MARQUITA GALES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GALE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23501
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS A. GALE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Eslick et al v. Culling et al
as 2:2022cv00677
Plaintiff:
Esther Eslick and Charles Eslick
Defendant:
Gale Culling, AAA Insurance Company, Inc. and North Star Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Stovall v. Gwathney et al
as 5:2022cv01110
Plaintiff:
Michael Leon Stovall
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Darryl Littleton, Dwayne Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SULLIVAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13534
Plaintiff:
AVERY GALE SULLIVAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
