Cases 31 - 40 of 517
Harmon v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC.
as 1:2023cv03091
Plaintiff:
Ranah Harmon
Defendant:
Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC. doing business as AT&T Georgia and Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC doing business as AT&T Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
HARMON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16911
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HARMON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARMON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16426
Plaintiff:
KYLE HARMON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARMON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15325
Plaintiff:
TYE HARMON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARMON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14979
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY HARMON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HAZELWOOD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14993
Plaintiff:
HARMON HAZELWOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
South v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al
as 4:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
Kayla South
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources, Kari Pearce, Christopher Pearce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harmon v. Smith (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Korey Devon Harmon
Defendant:
Shamal K. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Municipal of Cobb County, GA et al
as 1:2023cv01761
Plaintiff:
Randy Harmon, Jr.
Defendant:
Municipal of Cobb County, GA and Henry Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Augusta State Prison et al
as 1:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Michael David Williams
Defendant:
Augusta State Prison, Warden Forth, Deputy Warden Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
