Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski et al
as 1:2016cv04658
Plaintiff:
Chike Uzuegbunam
Defendant:
Stanley C. Preczewski, Lois C. Richardson, Jim B. Fatzinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. City of Hollywood Florida et al
as 0:2016cv62578
Plaintiff:
Charles Rhodes
Defendant:
City of Hollywood Florida, Chief of Police Sanchez, John Chidsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jiminez Buitrago v. Harwood et al
as 1:2016cv23429
Plaintiff:
Jorge Jiminez Buitrago
Defendant:
Lee C Harwood and Lee C Harwood PC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0075
Jiminez-Garcia v. Department of Corrections, State of Florida
as 2:2016cv14302
Plaintiff:
Eleazor Jiminez-Garcia
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morel et al v. United States Of America
as 0:2016cv60567
Defendant:
United States Of America
Plaintiff:
Rafael Morel and Dolores Jiminez De Morel
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 0134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00168
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Colon v. Jiminez et al
as 9:2015cv81206
Plaintiff:
Hector Lee Colon
Defendant:
Carey Jiminez and Scott Kozakoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jiminez v. Corizon LLC et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
Mario A. Jiminez
Defendant:
Corizon LLC, Dr. Friedaz, Dr. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jiminez v. Smith (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv01092
Plaintiff:
Mario A. Jiminez
Defendant:
Steven Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Transcardiac Therapeutics, Inc. v. Yoganathan et al
as 1:2014cv00981
Plaintiff:
Transcardiac Therapeutics, Inc.
Defendant:
Ajit Yoganathan , Jorge H. Jiminez , Vinod H. Thourani and others
Counter_claimant:
Emory University and Georgia Tech Research Corporation
Counter_defendant:
Transcardiac Therapeutics, Inc. and Omar M. Lattouf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
