Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Jones v. USA
as 1:2014cv00008
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Mark Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. Cherokee County, Georgia et al
as 1:2012cv03487
Plaintiff:
James Mark Jones
Defendant:
Cherokee County, Georgia , Roger Garrison , John K. Wiederhold and others
Mary Richardson Dozier v. Cherlene Vickers, et al
as 12-14844
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY LOUISE RICHARDSON DOZIER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHERLENE VICKERS, Clerk, DOUGLAS VALESKA, Prosecutor, LAWTON ARMSTRONG and others
Richardson Dozier v. Vickers et al
as 1:2012cv00518
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise Richardson Dozier
Defendant:
Cherlene Vickers, Douglas Valeska, Lawton Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humphrey et al v. The City of Headland et al
as 1:2012cv00366
Plaintiff:
Velma Jean Humphrey and Robert Lowe
Defendant:
The City of Headland , The City of Headland Police Department , Mark Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Juan Jone
as 11-14008
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN MARK JONES
Jones v. United States Of America
as 1:2011cv00048
Petitioner:
Mark Jones
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
International Association of Fire Fighters et al v. Bentley et al
as 5:2011cv01054
Plaintiff:
International Association of Fire Fighters , FIREPAC , American Federation of Teachers Local 2115 and others
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , Joseph B. Morton , Freida Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Little et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00532
Plaintiff:
Rupert Ward, Jr.
Defendant:
Chase Little, Dennis Cobb and Mark Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Armstrong et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2009cv00607
Plaintiff:
Frederick Owens
Defendant:
Lawton E. Armstrong, Clinton Law, Mark Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
