Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Shinn v. Bidez
as 2:2016cv00109
Plaintiff: Jodi V. Shinn
Defendant: E. Rene Bidez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charlemagne et al v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2016cv20172
Plaintiff: Jean-Elie Uriel Charlemagne and Emmanuel Michael Charlemagne
Defendant: State of Florida, Miami-Dade Corrections, Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shinn v. Reguero et al
as 6:2014cv01998
Plaintiff: Tobais Shinn, Sr.
Defendant: Jorge Reguero and City of Lake Mary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler Hospital v. Hansmann et al
as 8:2014mc00043
Plaintiff: Butler Hospital
Defendant: Officer Nathaniel Hansmann , Officer James P. Shinn and City of Largo, Florida
Shinn v. Thomas, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00504
Plaintiff: Robert James Shinn, Jr.
Defendant: Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shinn v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00428
Plaintiff: Robert James Shinn, Jr.
Defendant: Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Shinn
as 6:2014cv00592
Plaintiff: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant: Brandy Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Contract Insurance
Shinn v. Progressive Speciality Insurance Company
as 4:2013cv01616
Plaintiff: JoCecelia Shinn
Defendant: Progressive Speciality Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shinn v. State of Alabama
as 1:2013cv00349
Petitioner: Robert James Shinn, Jr.
Respondent: State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shinn v. Gordy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00346
Petitioner: Robert James Shinn, Jr.
Respondent: Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?