Cases 31 - 40 of 173
Stepherson v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv03547
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Stepherson
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Debra Anne Haaland, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Youngblood v. Suwannee Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00894
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Youngblood
Defendant:
Suwannee Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNGBLOOD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15837
Plaintiff:
ROBERT YOUNGBLOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Youngblood v. United States
as 2:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Youngblood
Defendant:
Artegus L. Felder and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Youngblood et al v. Bradford (CONSENT)
as 2:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
Shawn Keith Youngblood and Ryan Keith Rohan
Defendant:
Charles Nicholas Bradford, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
YOUNGBLOOD v. SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 3:2022cv06851
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE YOUNGBLOOD
Defendant:
SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Youngblood v. Santa Rosa Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Youngblood
Defendant:
Santa Rosa Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YOUNGBLOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05802
Plaintiff:
ANDREW YOUNGBLOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RIDLEY v. EMMERSEN et al
as 1:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
JUDGE DAVID EMMERSEN, JUDGE ANN HARRIS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
