Cases 41 - 50 of 343
KILGORE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19887
Plaintiff:
PATRICK KILGORE and PATRICK KILGORE, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Austin v. C.O. Campbell et al
as 3:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
Phillip L. Austin, Jr.
Defendant:
C.O. Campbell, Sgt. Ewing, Sgt. Bullard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Holcomb et al
as 1:2022cv01193
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Hawkins, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel Holcomb, Seth Bishop, Michael Kilgore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kilgore v. Circle K Stores, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03176
Plaintiff:
Loretta Kilgore
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Smith et al
as 7:2022cv00991
Plaintiff:
Samuel Leon Jones
Defendant:
Nick Smith, Richard Calloway and Kilgore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kilgore et al v. The United States Attorney Office of Atlanta et al
as 1:2021cv05327
Plaintiff:
Deborah Kilgore and Rhondolyn Kilgore
Defendant:
The United States Attorney Office of Atlanta, Department of Veterans Affairs, Atlanta VAMC and Matthew Haney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
