Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 98
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Cho et al
as 6:2017cv01103
Plaintiff: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant: Myong J. Cho , Justin S. Cho and Tuscany Ridge Homeowners Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Joseph Bradley v. Marlene Hernandez
as 17-11645
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSEPH BRADLEY
Defendant - Appellee: MARLENE HERNANDEZ, CHO Medical Doctor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00319
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Harpo et al v. Broadstone Court, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02956
Plaintiff: Wilhy Harpo, Leslie Onna and Alexander Corporate Accomodations, LLC
Defendant: Broadstone Court, LLC, Alliance Residential Properties, Fulton County Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Garcia v. Florida Department of Correcti, et al
as 16-15235
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSE RAFAEL GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, W. D. RUMMEL, SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ANNEX and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01525
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Dae Cho v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-12060
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAE EEK CHO
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Javado Thompson v. M. Nichols, et al
as 16-11236
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAVADO AUDRIC THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee: M. NICHOLS, ARNP and W. D. RUMMEL, MD CHO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv20799
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Beak et al v. Cho
as 2:2016cv00012
Plaintiff: Khloe Beak and Semin Lee
Defendant: Yong Goo Cho
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?