Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-16072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Delgado v. City Court of Albertville
as 4:2011cv03405
Plaintiff:
Raul Delgado
Defendant:
City Court of Albertville, D. Walker and Christy Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. City of Hollywood, Florida
as 0:2011cv60998
Plaintiff:
Zionna D. Walker, Devonson Walker and Stacey K. Walker
Defendant:
City of Hollywood, Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Middlebrook et al
as 5:2011cv00246
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Walker
Defendant:
Scott Middlebrook, Jason Terris, Joseph Henger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00252
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2010cv00396
Plaintiff:
Judith D. Walker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Internetshopsinc.com v. Six C Consulting, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02944
Plaintiff:
Internetshopsinc.com and Internetshopsinc.com
Defendant:
Six C Consulting, Inc. and Jimmie D. Walker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 a False representation-goods sold-interstate commer
Type:
Other Statutes
Internetshopsinc.com v. Six C Consulting, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00698
Plaintiff:
Internetshopsinc.com and Internetshopsinc.com
Defendant:
Six C Consulting, Inc. and Jimmie D. Walker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 a False representation-goods sold-interstate commer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
