Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Burrell v. Armor Correctional Health Services Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv62007
Plaintiff:
Karin Burrell
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services Inc., Stanley Frankowitz, John Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin et al v. Budd Properties, Inc. et al
as 7:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JOHN MARTIN, JR , NICKY TAMPAS , SAMUEL KEITH WALKER and others
Defendant:
BUDD PROPERTIES INC, BUDD COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE LLC, ROGER M BUDD, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Martins v. United States of America
as 0:2016cv63025
Plaintiff:
John Martins
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kaether v. Armor Correctional Health Services Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv62950
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Kaether
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services Inc., Sheriff of Broward County, Stanley Frankowitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spaulding v. USA
as 3:2016cv00841
Petitioner:
John Martin Spaulding
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Carmichael Engineering, Inc. v. Rutledge, et al.
as 2:2014cv01249
Plaintiff:
Carmichael Engineering, Inc.
Defendant:
John Martin Rutledge and Coach Ride, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards et al v. Armor Correctional Health Services Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv61577
Plaintiff:
Ceaniel Edwards , James Priester , Raleigh Priester, Jr and others
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services Inc., Scott Israel, John Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. Thomas, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00559
Plaintiff:
John Martin
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Therma-Tru Corp
as 6:2013cv00027
Plaintiff:
John Martin
Defendant:
Therma-Tru Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
