Cases 41 - 50 of 45,298
INTERNATIONAL HEALTH BRANDS, LLC v. FOY et al
as 9:2024cv80679
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL HEALTH BRANDS, LLC
Defendant:
ASHLEE R FOY, MICHAEL L KAUFMAN and KCM BRANDS, LLC
Michael BoweIn re: Michael Bowe
as 24-11704
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL S. BOWE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mashkevich v. Ava et al
as 4:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Michael Mashkevich
Defendant:
Olivia Ava, Emma Miller and F.B. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
HILLMAN v. SELF et al
as 5:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
MARVIN HILLMAN, III
Respondent:
JUDGE TILLMAN E. SELF, JUDGE CONNIE LYNN WILLIFORD, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CLIFFORD T WOODY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thompson v. City of Cape Coral
as 2:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Michael Thompson
Defendant:
City of Cape Coral
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Epps v. Blue Origin
as 6:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EPPS
Defendant:
BLUE ORIGIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Perez et al v. The Scotts Company, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60516
Plaintiff:
Amanda Perez and Michael Gregorio
Defendant:
The Scotts Company, LLC and Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Estate of Lane Caviness, et al v. Atlas Air, Inc., et al
as 24-11033
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS, PATRICK AKERLUND, MICHAEL ALZATI and others
Defendant:
ATLAS AIR, INC. and FLIGHT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wilhelm et al v. Atlas Financial Advisors, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00982
Plaintiff:
Michael Wilhelm and Nancy Wilhelm
Defendant:
Atlas Financial Advisors, Inc., Steven Van Metre and Arthur Cole Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
