Cases 41 - 50 of 292
Burch v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Vincent Burch
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Officer Richie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEEL MEDIA GROUP LLC v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2022cv21778
Plaintiff:
STEEL MEDIA GROUP LLC
Defendant:
HAROLD LEWIS and RICHIE BROWNE
v. STEEL MEDIA GROUP LLC et al
as 1:2022cv21779
Defendant:
STEEL MEDIA GROUP LLC, HAROLD LEWIS and RICHIE BROWNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
STEEL MEDIA GROUP LLC v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2022cv21780
Plaintiff:
STEEL MEDIA GROUP LLC
Defendant:
HAROLD LEWIS and RICHIE BROWNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Neely v. Elmore County et al
as 2:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Neely
Defendant:
Elmore County, Elmore County Commission, Henry Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boudreau v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01402
Plaintiff:
Richie Boudreau
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Coleman v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
William C. Coleman
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Tahir Siddiq, Patrice Richie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Crawford
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, L. White, S. Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGuire v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv00161
Petitioner:
Craig Ray McGuire
Respondent:
Patrice Richie Jones and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
