Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Jackson v. The Proctor & Gamble Distributing LLC et al
as 1:2011cv22683
Plaintiff:
Pamela S. Jackson
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Distributing LLC and The Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spooner et al v. Hall et al
as 1:2011cv02327
Plaintiff:
Christine McDaniel Spooner and Michael Spooner
Defendant:
Shirley A. Hall, C. Griffin, Forbes/FCSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Coatey et al
as 2:2011cv01439
Plaintiff:
James M Broadhead
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
S Coatney, Deaundra Johnson, Yambip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skillern v. Todd et al
as 6:2010cv00045
Plaintiff:
Warren Skillern
Defendant:
T. Todd and S. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren Skillern v. S. Jackson, et al
as 10-12190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN R. SKILLERN
Defendant - Appellee:
S. JACKSON, Georgia State Prison Office Manager and D. KAPPES, Georgia State Prison Library Manager
Skillern v. Jackson et al
as 6:2010cv00014
Plaintiff:
Warren Skillern
Defendant:
S. Jackson and D. Kappes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson et al v. Premium Capital Funding, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv01392
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Jackson, Daniel L. Jackson, Mamie S. Jackson and others
Defendant:
Premium Capital Funding, LLC, Option One Mortgage Corporation, Option One Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Jackson v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv00254
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Jackson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jackson v. Astrue
as 0:2007cv61509
Plaintiff:
Amy S. Jackson
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jackson v. Astrue
as 5:2007cv00334
Plaintiff:
Connie S. Jackson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
