Cases 41 - 50 of 3,292
Collins v. McClain et al
as 4:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Tony Jerrod Collins
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BMG RIGHTS MANAGEMENT (US) LLC et al v. 111 SW 2nd Ave, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60369
Plaintiff:
BMG RIGHTS MANAGEMENT (US) LLC d/b/a BMG GOLD SONGS, TONY FADD BEATS, IRISH INTELLECT and others
Defendant:
111 SW 2nd Ave, LLC and Shawn Morton
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Dismuke, Johnnie v. Palanco et al
as 0:2024cv60334
Plaintiff:
Johnnie L. Dismuke
Defendant:
P. Palanco and Gregory Tony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henry, John v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv14055
Plaintiff:
John Henry
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Johnny Frambo, Michael Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Petitioner:
Tony Lee Smith
Respondent:
Phillip Mitchell and A.D.O.C.
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Nexstar Media Group et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
Nexstar Media Group, Perry A. Sooks, Geoff Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samuel Rivera v. State of Florida
as 24-10477
Petitioner:
SAMUEL RIVERA, a.k.a Tony El Enfermo
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
JACKSON v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
TONY C. JACKSON, JR.
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
TONY C JACKSON, JR
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phan v. Bird
as 1:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Tony Phan
Defendant:
Troy Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
