Cases 51 - 60 of 8,567
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
Goldman v. Goldman et al
as 1:2024cv01467
Plaintiff:
Gary A. Goldman
Defendant:
Ricky L. Goldman, Ralph C. Goldman and James H Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Johnson v. Cook et al
as 5:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Hasan H. Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Cook, FNU Shinn, FNU Bostic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Andrew v. Babb et al
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Todd Andrew
Defendant:
Sheriff Barry H. Babb and Fayette County Adult Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villaruel et al v. Tradesmen Mechanical LLC
as 1:2024cv21292
Plaintiff:
Daniel Villaruel, William H. Marvel, Jr., Roger Hudspeth and others
Defendant:
Tradesmen Mechanical LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Barton v. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Lamont Anthony Barton
Defendant:
Ron H. Freeman and DeAndre Loucks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austin v. Hanover Insurance Company
as 8:2024cv01028
Defendant:
Hanover Insurance Company and Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
H. Richard Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Benjamin Watson, Jr., et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 24-11310
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN WATSON, JR., SHEILA WILEMON WATSON, SHANE WALTERS and others
Defendant:
KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA
Deandre Arnold v. Governor of the State of Georgia, et al
as 24-10835
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
BRIAN KEMP, CHRIS CARR, REGINALD SCANDRETT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
