Cases 51 - 60 of 200
Canal Insurance Company v. Energy Transport, LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00469
Defendant:
Energy Transport, LLC, Cassandra Morton, MPLX Terminals, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Canal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. Estes et al
as 5:2019cv00381
Defendant:
C Mitchem, Dewayne Estes, M Duffey and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Heath Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Morris
as 1:2019cv00126
Plaintiff:
Harrison Hall
Defendant:
Bruce Wayne Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pritchett v. Filmore et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00047
Defendant:
Dale County Alabama, Mark Anderson, William H. Filmore and others
Plaintiff:
Mike Pritchett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pritchett v. Filmore et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00047
Defendant:
Dale County Alabama, Mark Anderson, William H. Filmore and others
Plaintiff:
Mike Pritchett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv01011
Defendant:
Janet Davidson, Randall Houston, Michael Talley and others
Plaintiff:
Dwone Carnell Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Franklin et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00942
Defendant:
Janet Davidson, Sibley G. Reynolds, Randall Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Dwone Carnell Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. State Board of Medical Examiners et al
as 2:2018cv00719
Defendant:
Mark H. LeQuire, Bradley S. Rice, Board of Censors of the Medical Association of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Norris W. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett et al v. Chemed Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv01178
Plaintiff:
Justin Shipman, Brad Garrett, Jason Palmer and others
Defendant:
Chemed Corporation, Josephus Morrow, Roto-Rooter Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nicholson v. Harrison et al
as 5:2018cv01128
Defendant:
Floyd Lee, Sonya Shedd and Adam Harrison
Plaintiff:
Bruce Mitchell Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
