Cases 51 - 60 of 217
Neal v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 5:2021cv00713
Defendant:
Crestwood Healthcare LP doing business as Crestwood Medical Center, Charles D. Hooper, Emergency Medical Associates Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. City of Deltona et al
as 6:2021cv00750
Defendant:
Anita Bradford, Marsha Segal-George, Maritza Avila Vazquez and others
Plaintiff:
Brandy L. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooper v. Digital Media Solutions, LLC
as 8:2021cv00226
Defendant:
Digital Media Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Graham Hooper
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Carmichael v. Wexford Health Services Incorporated et al
as 5:2021cv00096
Defendant:
Castle Berry, Dr. Hooper, Wexford Health Services Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooper v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 8:2021cv00160
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc. d/b/a Sam's Club and Sam's East, Inc. doing business as Sam's Club
Plaintiff:
Will Hooper
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HOOPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv00847
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edgar Hooper, IIIIn re: Edgar Hooper, III
as 21-10013
Petitioner:
In re: EDGAR HOOPER, III
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HOOPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv13228
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS EARL HOOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. FRAME
as 3:2020cv05968
Plaintiff:
STACY ANTONIO SCOTT, JR and STACY CHANEL
Defendant:
W TURNER, D DICE, P TUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooper v. Digital Media Solutions, LLC
as 8:2020cv02572
Defendant:
Digital Media Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Graham Hooper
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
