Cases 51 - 60 of 102
Upchurch v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00946
Plaintiff:
Janice Upchurch
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv60589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
SCHMOLDT v. JEFFERIS et al
as 3:2012cv00544
Plaintiff:
MARTIN BURTON SCHMOLDT, III
Defendant:
WALTER JEFFERIS, MARK HALLFORD, ALMA UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00535
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., Cleaver Brooks, Inc., Bill Vann Company, Inc. and others
Not Yet Classified:
Mobile Infirmary Association
Plaintiff:
Ronald Melvin Morgan and Reuben Morgan
Not Classified By Court:
Michael E. Upchurch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chapman v. United States [central] government
as 0:2011cv61969
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chapman and Roanne Eye
Defendant:
United States [central] government, Federico A. Moreno, Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HURLEY v. WALKER et al
as 3:2011cv00317
Plaintiff:
WENDELL RAY HURLEY
Defendant:
WALKER, MILLER and UPCHURCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Desty v. Collection Information Bureau, Inc.
as 9:2011cv80114
Plaintiff:
Naomi M. Desty
Defendant:
Collection Information Bureau, Inc.
Mediator:
John Upchurch
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Akeem Muhammad v. George Sapp, et al
as 10-15381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AKEEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE SAPP, D. A. COLON, R. J. POCCIA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2010cv81160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Krotinger et al v. Upchurch et al
as 3:2010cv00431
Plaintiff:
Linda Gail Krotinger and Carole A. Perrin
Defendant:
Tracy Wilson Upchurch, Linda French Hegeman and Cynthia A. Pasackow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
