Cases 51 - 60 of 4,902
Walker v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Defendant:
Austin Keith Birch, Richard Roundtree, Daniel D'Versa and others
Plaintiff:
Jamarius Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02416
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Walker v. At Home Stores, LLC
as 1:2024cv02282
Defendant:
At Home Stores, LLC doing business as At Home, The Decor Superstore
Plaintiff:
Lorna Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Brown v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00316
Defendant:
Lt. Corcino, Tony Peterson, John Q. Hamm and others
Plaintiff:
Carvell Tony Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker, Jesse A. v. Weisberg et al
as 2:2024cv14161
Defendant:
Circuit Judge William L. Roby, Marry-Alice Kym Surowlec, Florida Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Alan Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. USA
as 7:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
FERRELL WALKER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walker v. Warden, RRM Orlando
as 6:2024cv00955
Respondent:
Warden, RRM Orlando
Petitioner:
Richard Barrett Dale Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Walker v. Peters
as 6:2024cv00943
Petitioner:
Richard Barrett Dale Walker
Respondent:
Warden, RRM Orlando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RASHADA v. HATHCOCK et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Defendant:
MARCUS CASTRO-WALKER, VELOCITY AUTOMOTIVE SOLUTIONS LLC, WILLIAM NAPIER and others
Plaintiff:
JADEN RASHADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
WALKER v. PATE
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
AMOS WALKER
Defendant:
PATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
