Cases 61 - 70 of 116
SEATS v. MAJORS et al
as 3:2020cv00127
Defendant:
OFFICER BRANDON TEMPLES, OFFICER JOHN DOE 2, OFFICER NATHAN MAJORS and others
Plaintiff:
MOSES SOLOMON ISAIAH SEATS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kidd v. Stewart et al
as 1:2020cv00544
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Lt. Dailey and Cynthia Stewart
Plaintiff:
William Darnell Kidd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolston v. City of Atlanta Georgia et al
as 1:2020cv04221
Defendant:
Officers John Doe 1-5, Police Chief Rodney Bryant, Officer FNU Wadsworth and others
Plaintiff:
Justin T. Tolston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates et al v. The City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2020cv04074
Defendant:
Matthew Winn, Officers John Doe # 1-5, Christian Malstrom and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Bates and Lakeisha James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Jackson et al
as 1:2020cv02896
Defendant:
Female Officer Chisolm, Officer Rodgers, Dep. N. Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Malik Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ham v. Inch et al
as 9:2020cv81071
Defendant:
Francisco Acosta, Sargeant John Doe #3, SGT. Salmon and others
Plaintiff:
Ottis Lee Ham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. State of GA et al
as 1:2020cv02255
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 2, City of Atlanta, State of GA and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley H. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bermudez v. City of West Palm Beach et al
as 9:2020cv80765
Defendant:
City of West Palm Beach, Sheriff Department of West Palm Beach FL, Officer John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Narciso Rosales Bermudez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Nielsen et al
as 4:2020cv00045
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Jane Does, Hillary Nielsen and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Andrew Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beltran-Kelsey v. Roberts et al
as 1:2020cv00541
Defendant:
Sergeant- C. Head, Officer John Does, Deputy J. Watkins and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Beltran-Kelsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
