Cases 71 - 80 of 116
Johnson v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00710
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Carla Jones, Shawn C. Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. Jones et al
as 1:2013cv01725
Petitioner:
Glenn Edward Ball
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Carla Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Burwell v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 2:2013cv01168
Plaintiff:
Carla Canty Burwell
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 rt Job Discrimination/Retaliation
Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company v. Watts Builders, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2012cv00994
Plaintiff:
Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Watts Builders, L.L.C., Watts Development Company, Inc., Watts Homes, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Lambert v. District Court of Houston County et al(MAG+)
as 1:2012cv00912
Plaintiff:
Travis Lee Lambert
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Houston County Alabama, Brady E. Mendheim, Jr., Douglas A. Valeska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv03461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
