Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 83
Iglesias v. USP Atlanta et al
as 1:2011cv00581
Petitioner: Erick Valle Iglesias
Respondent: USP Atlanta, J.A. Keller and J. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Exford v. City of Montgomery et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01071
Plaintiff: Riccardo Exford
Defendant: City of Montgomery , J.A. Norgard and Officer Shoupe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthmann, v. CAB Asset Management, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv24472
Plaintiff: Greg Arthmann,
Defendant: CAB Asset Management, LLC and Albert J.A. Young
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carmichael v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 1:2010cv24454
Plaintiff: Kenja O. Carmichael
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prison, Federal Bureau Investigations, Regional Sero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd Williams v. J.A. Keller
as 10-15719
Petitioner - Appellant: LLOYD ANTHONIE WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee: J.A. KELLER, Warden
Jernigan v. Keller
as 1:2010cv03112
Petitioner: Dewayne Alan Jernigan
Respondent: J.A. Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson v. Keller (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00504
Plaintiff: Roy Jackson
Defendant: J.A. Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williamson v. Keller (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00232
Plaintiff: Fredel Williamson
Defendant: J.A. Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2009cv02317
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00188
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?