Cases 71 - 80 of 110
Schmitt v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01426
Plaintiff:
Simone Schmitt
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmitt v. Courtesy Professional Security, Inc.
as 6:2018cv00493
Plaintiff:
Patrick Schmitt
Defendant:
Courtesy Professional Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Foster v. Dave Schmitt Engineering, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00101
Plaintiff:
Christine Foster
Defendant:
Dave Schmitt Engineering, Inc. and Dave Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv01642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Schmitt v. St. Germain Steakhouse, LLC
as 2:2017cv00431
Plaintiff:
Joseph Schmitt
Defendant:
St. Germain Steakhouse, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Schmitt v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Allison Nicole Schmitt
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
In Re: 21st Century Oncology Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 8:2016md02737
Defendant:
21st Century Oncology Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, 21st Century Oncology of California, 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Stacey Schall Adams, Bradley Bernius, Jeffrey Lewin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnold v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv01886
Plaintiff:
George Arnold
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Kyle McQuillan, James P. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. iGov Technologies Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv02701
Plaintiff:
Miquiel Banks
Defendant:
iGov Technologies Inc. , Kim Schmitt , David Nowak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gunn v. Goossen et al
as 6:2014cv00745
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lanard Gunn, Sr.
Defendant:
Peter M. Goossen, Jarin L. Reddick and Ronald Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
