Cases 81 - 90 of 8,329
Jackson v. Perry et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Trevelis D. Jackson
Defendant:
Counselor Perry, Correctional Officer Guyton, Sgt. Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ferguson v. Gaines et al
as 2:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Willie Howard Ferguson
Defendant:
Officer Raymond Lewis Gaines, Officer Quincy Jones, Warden Gwendolyn Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRIESTER v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRIESTER, JAMES THOMAS and DAVID JACKSON
Defendant:
SCOTT S HARRIS, GRANT MALOY, EUGENE GRINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. City of Jackson, Alabama
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Mary Jackson
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Alabama
OUZTS v. JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Caylor Ouzts
Defendant:
JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Brentrez McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10687
Plaintiff:
BRENTREZ MCPHERSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TYRONE OLIVER, JACOB BEASLEY and others
Scott Myers v. Sheriff of Mobile County, Alabama, et al
as 24-10760
Plaintiff:
SCOTT MYERS
Defendant:
SHERIFF OF MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA, JACKSON, SAM HOUSTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
