Cases 81 - 90 of 130
Davis v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jack A. Davis
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Chris West, John Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Lowndes County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00138
Plaintiff:
Ezzard O. Taylor
Defendant:
Lowndes County Jail and Lowndes County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON et al v. LOWNDES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al
as 7:2014cv00157
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON and JACQUELYN JOHNSON
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION , FRED WETHERINGTON , WES TAYLOR and others
Movant:
CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON et al v. LOWNDES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 7:2014cv00158
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON and JACQUELYN JOHNSON
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION , FRED WETHERINGTON , MIKE DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Carter v. Lowndes County Detention Facility (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00101
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewane Carter
Defendant:
Lowndes County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOULTRIE v. BRUCE et al
as 7:2013cv00162
Plaintiff:
CORY MOULTRIE
Defendant:
MARTY A BRUCE and LOWNDES COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
