Cases 1 - 10 of 1,713
CLARKE v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
JEROME CLARKE
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER and Warden TEKETA JESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Lewis et al
as 4:2024cv00105
Defendant:
Counselor Rauls, COII Shakristy Lewis, SGT Henry Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Dewayne McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv02362
Plaintiff:
Reginald Mason
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00138
Petitioner:
Jonathan Rice
Respondent:
Warden Joshua Jones, Tyrone Oliver, Officer Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MUTAZZ v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
SAID MUTAZZ
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, GREGORY SAMPSON, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elena Saville v. Clarence Webb, et al
as 24-10998
Plaintiff:
ELENA LYADINA SAVILLE
Defendant:
CLARENCE WILLIAM WEBB, ROBERT ALLEN WHITWORTH, RANDY CLARENCE HOPPER and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
McKinney v. (GDC) Legal Division et al
as 1:2024cv02334
Plaintiff:
Mr. Charlie Lamonte McKinney, Jr.
Defendant:
(GDC) Legal Division, Office of Professional Standards, Governor Brian Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Handberg
as 3:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Carnell Oliver
Defendant:
Roger Handberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Gencare Resources, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00650
Defendant:
Gencare Resources, LLC, Gencare Resources Home Healthcare and Olive Gaye
Plaintiff:
Lady Gomez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
