Cases 1 - 10 of 3,841
Derousseau v. Winter Haven Police Dept. et al
as 8:2024cv01120
Plaintiff:
Chenel Derousseau
Defendant:
Winter Haven Police Dept., Michael Kelly, Bruce Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams-Clark v. McClelland et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Adam Y. Williams-Clark
Defendant:
Chief Judge Troy Russell McClelland and City of Cumming, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSSELL v. MILLER HARDWARE COMPANY LLC
as 7:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SEAN RUSSELL
Defendant:
MILLER HARDWARE COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
AIR SANSONE, LLC v. CSA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80589
Plaintiff:
AIR SANSONE, LLC
Defendant:
CSA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC, SCOTT RITCHIE, RUSSELL DISE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
L.W. v. Carlson
as 1:2024cv01912
Plaintiff:
L.W.
Defendant:
Russel Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Russell v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Russell, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Tallapoosa County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moliere Dimanche, Jr. v. Takela Jackson, et al
as 24-11267
Plaintiff:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Defendant:
TAKELA JACKSON, RABIH TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
R.C. v. Broce et al
as 1:2024cv01665
Plaintiff:
R.C.
Defendant:
Candice Broce and Russel Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
