Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 294
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff: Skylar Salem
Defendant: William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Lundie v. Obama
as 1:2024cv01317
Plaintiff: Jasmine Nicole Lundie
Defendant: Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Mayam v. Obama et al
as 1:2023cv01215
Plaintiff: Fe'Anah Bent Mayam
Defendant: Barack Obama, Joe Biden and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WILLIAMS v. OBAMA
as 4:2023cv00022
Plaintiff: JUDITH MARCIA WILLIAMS
Defendant: BARACK OBAMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIARRA v. OBAMA
as 5:2022cv00028
Plaintiff: MOUSSA DIARRA
Defendant: BARACK OBAMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mario Herrera, et al v. Joe Biden, et al
as 21-12476
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARIO HERRERA and GITTE TOLDSTED
Defendant / Appellee: JOE BIDEN, BARACK OBAMA, ERIC HOLDER and others
Michael Atraqchi, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-11526
Plaintiff / Appellant: IRENE S. ATRAQCHI and MICHAEL R. ATRAQCHI
Defendant / Appellee: MUMTAZ FARGO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHELLE OBAMA and others
Atraqchi et al v. United States of America et al
as 8:2021cv00956
Defendant: Marie Hanson, Jackie Lemke, Mike Hanson and others
Plaintiff: Michael R. Atraqchi and Irene S. Atraqchi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Johnson v. Biden et al(MAG+)(MEMBER)
as 2:2021cv00269
Defendant: Joseph Biden, Barack Obama, Queen Elizabeth and others
Plaintiff: Clarence D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Obama et al (MAG+)(MEMBER)
as 2:2021cv00270
Defendant: Joseph Biden, Barack Obama, Queen Elizabeth and others
Plaintiff: Clarence D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?