Cases 1 - 10 of 67
ROOKS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, TOMMY J SMITH, ALISON BURLESON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Llovera v. Parker et al
as 5:2023cv01567
Plaintiff:
Rafael Llovera
Defendant:
Stephen D Parker, Michael Burleson, Michael Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. YOUNG et al
as 5:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
ROMAN BEY
Defendant:
DANNETT A YOUNG, COUNTY OF WILKINSON COURTS and HONORABLE ALISON T BURLESON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURLESON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16435
Plaintiff:
CHASE BURLESON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURLESON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25562
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BURLESON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURLESON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10379
Plaintiff:
STACY GRANT BURLESON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BURLESON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18939
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS BURLESON, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Steven Sherman v. A Burleson, et al
as 22-11686
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN DOUGLAS SHERMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
A BURLESON, Officer, PULLEY, J D HOLLAND, Officer and others
BURLESON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67007
Plaintiff:
ERIK BURLESON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
