Cases 1 - 10 of 542
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Atlanta Public Schools et al
as 1:2024cv02045
Plaintiff:
Shirlene Jones
Defendant:
Atlanta Public Schools, Dr. Lisa Herring, Caroline Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Battle v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Defendant:
Joseph Headley and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Battle v. Alabama, State of
as 2:2024cv00540
Petitioner:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Respondent:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burnette v. Griffin-Spalding County School District et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Burnette
Defendant:
Griffin-Spalding County School District, Dr. Keith Simmons, R. Syntel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Carr et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00460
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Carr, Jazemine Adams, Brandon D Alexander-Pryor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Battle v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
