Cases 1 - 10 of 471
Nichols v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv00229
Defendant:
Detective BE Davis, Mike Maloof, Public Defender's Office, Dekalb County and others
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
BRIGHT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM S. BRIGHT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winshman et al v. Bright Mountain Media, Inc.
as 9:2024cv81265
Plaintiff:
Nadav Slutzky, Joey Winshman and Eli Desatnik
Defendant:
Bright Mountain Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Bright v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00971
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Malcolm M. Bright
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61684
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02107
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Moore v. Bright Line Train Corporation, Inc.
as 9:2024cv80921
Defendant:
Bright Line Train Corporation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Layfun Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bright v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv02925
Defendant:
Douglas County, Fulton County, Rashida Oliver and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Boone Bright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01061
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
