Cases 1 - 10 of 19
HANSLEY v. C&F FINANCE COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
DEMORRIO HANSLEY
Defendant:
C&F FINANCE COMPANY and FLOWERS HONDA DEALERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hansley v. C&F Finance Company et al
as 5:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Demorrio Hansley
Defendant:
C&F Finance Company and Flowers Honda Dealership
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
F. v. Buckner et al
as 2:2022cv00529
Plaintiff:
C. F.
Defendant:
Nancy Buckner and Kim Mashego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Progressive Express Insurance Company v. C&F Transport, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv20775
Plaintiff:
Progressive Express Insurance Company
Defendant:
C&F Transport, LLC and as Personal Represen Daylen Angel Bello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Rushin v. Hill
as 1:2022cv00290
Petitioner:
Ronald Earle Rushin
Respondent:
Officer C. F. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FINLEY v. FACEBOOK INC
as 5:2021cv00180
Plaintiff:
MICHELE FINLEY and C F
Defendant:
FACEBOOK INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CMBG Advisors, Inc. et al v. R2 logistics, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00386
Plaintiff:
C&F Foods Logistics Services, Inc., Arizona Flexible Packing, Inc. and CMBG Advisors, Inc.
Defendant:
R2 logistics, Inc. and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LAMBERT v. HUGHES et al
as 3:2020cv06024
Defendant:
OFFICER SHAW, A FLORES, DEVINE and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC W LAMBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01770
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Kona Ice, Inc. v. Dubbs Enterprises, LLC et al
as 0:2020cv60911
Defendant:
Dubbs Enterprises, LLC, Texas Stewart Group, LLC, Triple LLL, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kona Ice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
