Cases 1 - 10 of 175
Adams v. Baskin et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00009
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, T. Brooks, Officer Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brent Brown v. J. Giles, et al
as 16-11474
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRENT CODY BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
J. C. GILES and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Charles Muckle v. John Bray, et al
as 15-10366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES CALVIN MUCKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. BRAY, Individually and as an employee for the Barrow County Sheriff Department, GLENN AGUILAR, Individually and as an employee for the Barrow County Sheriff Department, C. GILES, Individually and as an employee for the Barrow County Sheriff Department and others
:
JOEL ROBINSON
GILES et al v. BIG BEND COMMUNITY BASED CARE INC
as 4:2014cv00311
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE C GILES and RESTORATION I INC
Defendant:
BIG BEND COMMUNITY BASED CARE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barnes v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00887
Plaintiff:
Demario Shawn Barnes
Defendant:
Karla Jones, J. C. Giles, Rene Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Jones, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00884
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Karla Jones, J. C. Giles, Rene Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Maze v. State of Alabama, et al
as 13-13941
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH D. MAZE
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF ALABAMA, J. C. GILES and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Thomas v. Giles et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00597
Plaintiff:
Elijah Thomas
Defendant:
J. C. Giles and Officer Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Giles et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2012cv01041
Plaintiff:
James E. Howell
Defendant:
J. C. Giles and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howell v. Giles et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv01041
Plaintiff:
James E. Howell
Defendant:
J. C. Giles and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
