Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Muhammad v. Sheppard et al
as 3:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Furquan S. Muhammad
Defendant:
Stan Sheppard, Captain Scott and Warden of Montgomery State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Sheppard et al
as 1:2022cv03874
Plaintiff:
Furquan S. Muhammad
Defendant:
Regional Director Stan Sheppard, Captain Scott and Warden of Montgomery State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. MINTON et al
as 3:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEWIS ROBINSON
Defendant:
CAPTAIN JOHN MINTON, CAPTAIN SCOTT PECORE and ALCOVY JUDICIAL SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Smith et al
as 2:2021cv01426
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Thomas
Defendant:
Warden Smith, Captain Jackson, Captain Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dees v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00371
Defendant:
Steward Shaw, Officer A. Johnson, Officer Terrell and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Peters et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv01829
Defendant:
A. Adams, Kenneth Peters, Captain Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy K. Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Peters et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00577
Defendant:
A. Adams, Kenneth Peters, Captain Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy K. Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWRENCE v. PECORE et al
as 3:2020cv00055
Defendant:
CAPTAIN JOHN MINTON, CAPTAIN SCOTT PECORE, MAJOR WADE HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
SANTARIO LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2020cv00226
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Sarasota County Police Chief, Nancy Ludwigsen and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Conrad Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICKARD v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2019cv00091
Defendant:
CAPTAIN SCOTT PECORE, MAJOR WADE HARRIS, CAPTAIN JOHN MINTON and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN RICKARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
