Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
The People of the State of Georgia, ex rel. et al v. Neville et al
as 2:2023cv00215
Plaintiff: The People of the State of Georgia, ex rel. and Terence J. Sweeney
Defendant: Richard Neville, Walker H. Bramlett, Pamela D. Bowels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. Smith
as 3:2019cv00150
Petitioner: Brian Roberts, Jr.
Respondent: Chuck Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jane Doe v. Chuck Smith
as 19-13523
Defendant / Appellee: CHUCK SMITH, in his individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANE DOE
Nally v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00096
Respondent: Jim Hammond, James Woodruff and Chuck Smith
Petitioner: Paul L. Nally
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jane Doe v. Stephen Sheely, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-11128
Defendant / Appellee: CHUCK SMITH, in his individual capacity and STEPHEN ROBERT SHEELY, in his individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANE DOE
Carter v. Meriwether County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2019cv00031
Respondent: Robert Petterkin, Meriwether County Sheriff's Department and Chuck Smith
Petitioner: Robert Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Sheely et al
as 3:2018cv00122
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Stephen Robert Sheely and Chuck Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00311
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00006
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Eady v. Smith et al
as 3:2016cv00019
Plaintiff: Michael Shane Eady
Defendant: Chuck Smith and Jay Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?