Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Chisholm v. Diversicare, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
Lewis F Chisholm
Defendant:
Diversicare, Inc., Hoover Police Department, June Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jennifer Cook, et al v. Integrated Behavioral Health, Inc., et al
as 23-11321
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JENNIFER COOK and SALLY GAITHER
Defendant / Appellee:
INTEGRATED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC., SANJAY MALHOTRA, UNITY PSYCHIATRIC CARE and others
Hilliard v. Diversicare of Pell City LLC
as 4:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
LaQuesta Hilliard
Defendant:
Diversicare of Pell City LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Walker et al v. PharMerica Logistics Services, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00046
Defendant:
Diversicare Management Services, April Yearling, PharMerica Logistics Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Walker, Dennis Christopher Walker and Geoffrey Christian Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rivers v. Diversicare of Montgomery, LLC
as 2:2020cv00559
Plaintiff:
Keith Rivers
Defendant:
Diversicare of Montgomery, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00314
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01695
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Smith v. Diversicare Leasing Corp. et al
as 2:2018cv00979
Defendant:
Diversicare Leasing Corp., Diversicare Management Services Co., Inc. and Diversicare of Montgomery, LLC
Plaintiff:
Roy Earl Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
