Cases 1 - 10 of 15
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
LARRY GENE SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv04673
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GARY GENE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00667
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey and Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serratt v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Smith, Jr., Jonathan Yancy, Roy Murphy Rutledge and others
Defendant:
Warden Butler, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv36634
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GENE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitaker Jr et al v. Hoover City of et al
as 2:2018cv00524
Plaintiff:
Meade Whitaker Jr and Frances W Schoonover
Defendant:
Hoover City of, Jack Wright, Brian Skelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gene Smith v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 17-11373
Petitioner - Appellant:
GENE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
USA v. Rubyn Smith
as 14-15201
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RUBYN GENE SMITH
Caldwell v. Nocco et al
as 8:2014cv02167
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Caldwell
Defendant:
Chris Nocco and Gene Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv02584
Petitioner:
Gene Smith
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General for the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
