Cases 1 - 10 of 24
CARLTON v. DEWITT et al
as 5:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARLTON
Defendant:
CERT OFFICER DEWITT, UNIT MANAGER WILCOX and GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILCOX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv22047
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARLTON WILCOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TALLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv92348
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARLTON TALLEY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURNETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv83589
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARLTON BURNETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01098
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Fuller v. Ayala et al
as 2:2016cv00974
Plaintiff:
James Carlton Fuller
Defendant:
Franklin Esteban Villar Ayala , F&R Transport Inc and Guimay Transport Logistics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hall v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00689
Plaintiff:
Jason Jermaine Hall
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Cam Ward, Mike Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Thomas, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00439
Plaintiff:
Michael James Baker
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Christopher Gordy, Luther Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keiss v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Keiss
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Christopher Gordy and James Carlton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keiss v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00951
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Keiss
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Christopher Gordy, James Carlton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
