Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Hickman v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00352
Plaintiff:
Edward Philpot Hickman
Defendant:
Karla Jones, Luther Strange, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cheatham et al v. Thomas et al
as 4:2014cv01952
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cheatham , Mark Duke , James Edwards and others
Defendant:
Kim Thomas , James Deloach , Terrance McDonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howlet v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv01077
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Howlet
Defendant:
Carter F. Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00348
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Hatcher
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas, James Deloach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv00808
Plaintiff:
Michael Mays
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv00240
Plaintiff:
Allan Williams
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Thomas et al
as 5:2013cv01365
Plaintiff:
Rashad C Lee
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, James Deloach, Grant Culliver and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00984
Plaintiff:
Brian Heath Harrison
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Phelix Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kenner v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00938
Plaintiff:
Bradley Kenner
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Gwendolyn Mosely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
