Cases 1 - 10 of 17
WASHINGTON v. DYAS et al
as 5:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
SEDRICK WASHINGTON
Defendant:
COLE DYAS, EARL B KNOBLES, JR, RICKY MAZINGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FISHER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06872
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. FISHER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HASPEL v. CENTURION OF FLORIDA et al
as 5:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HASPEL
Defendant:
CENTURION OF FLORIDA, P JANSEN, N HESSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04680
Plaintiff:
ALANA PAYTON, COLE M. RADICIC, MATTHEW WHELIHAN and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FISHER JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv69948
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M FISHER JR
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FISHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv37652
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONTE M FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fisher v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2017cv62153
Plaintiff:
Mitzie M. Fisher
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fisher v. Henline (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00722
Plaintiff:
Johnny M. Fisher
Defendant:
Robert Henline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv01358
Plaintiff:
Linda M Fisher
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nally v. The Grand Jury of Bartow County, Georgia et al
as 1:2014cv02663
Plaintiff:
Paul L. Nally
Defendant:
The Grand Jury of Bartow County, Georgia, Marie Wilson Williams, Jeffery C. Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
